Lucky for me, pregnant women can’t run very fast

If my mate ever complains about the rigors of pregnancy, I’m just going to point her to this video of the Surinam Pipa toad.

Surinam toads are most well-known for their remarkable reproductive habits. The partners rise from the floor while in amplexus and flip through the water in arcs. During each arc, the female releases 3-10 eggs, which get embedded in the skin on her back by the male’s movements. After implantation the eggs sink into the skin and form pockets over a period of several days, eventually taking on the appearance of an irregular honeycomb. The larvae develop through the tadpole stage inside these pockets, eventually emerging from the mother’s back as fully developed toads, though they are less than an inch long (2 cm).

Hike the Geek : Umbrellas and duck wading

Flickr Tag Error: Call to display photo '3127354441' failed.

Error state follows:

  • stat: fail
  • code: 98
  • message: Invalid auth token

Kids with umbrellas are adorable
(more…)

Some days, parents dream of this, I’m sure.

Via the_carrot

Compounded fluffy

Oh listen honey! She's purring again!'

Duty (NSFW) [Edit: Removed per Marcus Ranum's request]

This is an excerpt from the original:

I believe this excerpt is consistent with Fair Use provisions of copyright law, as I will be referring to the image “for purposes such as criticism” in a later blog post.

The Grandmaster Experiment

The Grandmaster Experiment by Carlin Flora

Judit, Susan and Sophia grew up in a veritable chess cocoon spun by their father, Laszlo, the intellectual equivalent of Serena and Venus Williams’ autocratic tennis dad, Richard. Some people consider Laszlo’s role in shaping his daughters’ careers to be absolute; others call it a happy coincidence. Raw talent and a childhood with all the advantages account for success in many fields, and chess is no exception. But the paths Susan, Judit and Sophia took as adults illuminate many intangibles in the achievement equation. An aggressive streak, birth order, a chance encounter that leads to a marriage on the other side of the world—these factors and changes of fortune are just as critical in determining whether a person rises to the top of his or her game.

Forty years ago, Laszlo Polgar, a Hungarian psychologist, conducted an epistolary courtship with a Ukrainian foreign language teacher named Klara. His letters to her weren’t filled with reflections on her cherubic beauty or vows of eternal love. Instead, they detailed a pedagogical experiment he was bent on carrying out with his future progeny. After studying the biographies of hundreds of great intellectuals, he had identified a common theme—early and intensive specialization in a particular subject. Laszlo thought the public school system could be relied upon to produce mediocre minds. In contrast, he believed he could turn any healthy child into a prodigy. He had already published a book on the subject, Bring Up Genius!, and he needed a wife willing to jump on board.

Laszlo’s grandiose plan impressed Klara, and the two were soon married. In 1973, when she was barely 4 years old, Susan, their rather hyperactive firstborn, found a chess set while rummaging through a cabinet. Klara, who didn’t know a single rule of the ancient game, was delighted to find Susan quietly absorbed in the strange figurines and promised that Laszlo would teach her the game that evening.

Chess, the Polgars decided, was the perfect activity for their protogenius: It was an art, a science, and like competitive athletics, yielded objective results that could be measured over time. Never mind that less than 1 percent of top chess players were women. If innate talent was irrelevant to Laszlo’s theory, so, then, was a child’s gender. “My father is a visionary,” Susan says. “He always thinks big, and he thinks people can do a lot more than they actually do.”

Hike the Geek

Hike the Geek this Sunday! We’ll be meeting at the Shoreline trail in Mountain View. This is an easy, fun hike.

“He snapped my bra like a Concord taking off, and I was unhooked for love.”

A friend of mine recently posted what she’s looking for in a mate. Inspired, I decided to make one of my own.

Strong wants/must haves

(more…)

The Nation Is Not A House

The Nation Is Not A House

Let’s reflect on the rhetoric used by those who oppose greater freedom for people to move back and forth across political borders. Opponents of the freedom to move frequently analogize a nation to a house. “You lock your house, don’t you?” these anti-immigrationists ask—implying that what makes sense for a home makes equally good sense for a nation.

Analogies are useful for analyses, debate, and persuasion. But just as they can enlighten, analogies can also mislead. They must be used, and heard, always with care.

The analogy of a home to a nation is more misleading than helpful. Unlike a home, a nation—at least each nation whose citizens are free—is not a private domain; it does not belong to anyone in the way that a house belongs to its owner. Also unlike in a home, living space within a free country is allocated by market transactions rather than by the conscious, nonmarket decisions of the residents of a house. A person who enters a country and purchases a place to live displaces no one in the way that an intruder into a home would displace a resident from his bed and favorite chair. In addition, of course, every intruder into a home likely intends to inflict some harm on the household’s residents. In contrast, the vast majority of persons who enter a country intend no harm to anyone.

Marcus’s first birthday

Flickr Tag Error: Call to display photo '3114731589' failed.

Error state follows:

  • stat: fail
  • code: 98
  • message: Invalid auth token

(more…)