Objectivist college in the works

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/06/09/founders

Plan for New College Draws Scrutiny
New private liberal arts colleges aren’t established every day, so pending proposals in Maine and North Carolina to create institutions from scratch have officials in those states intrigued. But the proposals, which have been cloaked in mystery, are raising some eyebrows — partly because of their sponsors’ ties to Ayn Rand’s Objectivism philosophy, and partly because of suggestions that Maine officials expedited their usual process for approving new colleges because the college’s backers are reportedly looking to buy a vacant $26 million piece of land. (Maine officials deny those accusations.)

Applications to create Founders College, as the new institution would be called, were submitted nearly a year ago in North Carolina and just last month in Maine. The main people behind both applications are Gary Hull and Eric Daniels, who are a senior lecturing fellow and visiting assistant professor, respectively, at Duke University’s Program on Values and Ethics in the Marketplace, one of multiple such programs at colleges in North Carolina that are supported financially by BB&T Bank.

Hull and Daniels are also officers of two recently established nonprofit groups in North Carolina, Founders College Education, Inc., and the College of Rational Education, Inc., the latter of which, in its North Carolina articles of incorporation, describes its mission as providing “a reality-based, rationally grounded education, by applying Objectivism, the philosophy of Rand, to all of the Corporation’s activities and undertakings.” Both men are also affiliated with the Ayn Rand Institute.

Others listed as officers of Founders College Education, Inc., include Tedd Potts, president of a Chevrolet dealership in Kansas City, Mo., and an active member of the Kansas City Objectivists group, and Tamara K. Fuller, of Columbia, Md., a management consultant.

Hull, when reached via e-mail, said it was “premature” to talk about the plans for Founders College, and otherwise declined comment. Daniels did not respond to a request for comment.

At this point, it is not clear whether the team behind the proposals envision starting colleges in both states, or only one. (The Founders College founders have also discussed Virginia as a possible destination.) What little information is available about the plans for the college(s) is contained in the applications the sponsors submitted to state officials.

In North Carolina, the application submitted to the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina system, which licenses degree granting institutions in its state, proposed creating a nonprofit college that would offer associate and bachelor’s degrees in the liberal arts beginning in fall 2007, according to Michelle Howard-Vital, who oversees licensure as assistant vice president for academic affairs for the North Carolina system.

Because the proposed college “does not have a track record,” its sponsors have applied for an “interim permit” to operate — an institution must have been operating for at least two years to qualify for permanent recognition, Howard-Vital said. Hull and Daniels submitted the “bare bones” application for licensure last year, but Howard-Vital said that her office had delayed its review of how well Founders met the state’s 15 licensure standards, on such things as curriculum, library holdings and finances, because “there was nothing for us to investigate.”

“I’ve been waiting until there’s enough in terms of content to be able to say to the Board of Governors, either way, that this is or is not recommended for licensure,” she said. Those behind Founders submitted a budget only recently, and Howard-Vital said that North Carolina officials now feel that they have enough information to schedule a review by a team of officials from the state and from other colleges. The review, which will be led by the Richard Neel, former chairman of the business school at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and include a liberal arts dean as well as a library expert, could occur within the next four to six weeks, Howard-Vital said.

Moving Fast in Maine

If the approval process for Founders College has been in the slow lane in North Carolina, it has very much been on the fast track in Maine. According to documents gathered by and published in the Village Soup, an online and print publisher that has community newspapers in two counties north of Portland, Me., state higher education officials first learned about the possible creation of Founders College there because the college’s backers were in discussions with state economic development officials about buying a $26.4 million mountainside retreat.

An article in the newspaper suggested that the state’s Department of Education had subverted its normal procedures for considering the creation of new colleges by establishing a panel to review the institution before Founders officials had formally submitted an application to the state and provided a range of supporting materials.

Through a state open records request, the newspaper also got hold of e-mail messages in which economic development officials asked leaders in the Education Department to keep financial information about the real estate deal quiet. “It appears some state officials were willing to abide by these requests, and put Founders on some fast track before knowing the full extent of the proposed college’s board of directors, educational mission and curriculum,” the Village Soup Times said in an editorial.

In an interview Wednesday, the state’s education commissioner, Susan A. Gendron, said state officials had received the required “letter of intent” from Founders officials before the Board of Education voted to form the review panel on May 8. Gendron acknowledged that the education department “formed the review team before we had the [budget and other supporting] materials.”

That was done in large part, she said, to accommodate the desire of Founders officials to begin operating in fall 2007, which would require approval during the state legislative session that begins in January. “Our role is to expedite folks to be able to achieve and have access to our processes,” she said. “We’re a resource to entities who wish to come to Maine. But we have protocols and we have to follow the statute,” she said. “We were not trying to circumvent or in any way advance this college – we’re just making sure they had access to the steps.”

But the steps are undoubtedly happening speedily. The review panel, which includes the presidents or other administrators from Bates, Husson and Unity Colleges, Central Maine Community College, and the University of Maine at Augusta, will meet next week to conduct a “thorough review” of the Founders proposal, including the financial backing and the content of the curriculum, Gendron said.

As in North Carolina, the college seeks approval to offer associate and bachelor’s degrees in the liberal arts. But unlike in North Carolina, according to the Village Soup Times, the college is seeking to operate as a for-profit entity, with backing from “corporate supporters” as well as tuition of $28,853 a year.

The review panel will make a recommendation to Gendron, who will then make her own recommendation to the Board of Education. Final approval would require an act of the Legislature.

A Modest Proposal To Abolish Universities

Via Flutterby:

http://fredoneverything.net/PadreKinoUniversity.shtml

A Modest Proposal To Abolish Universities

About Time

July 21, 2006

I think it is time to close the universities, and perhaps prosecute the professoriat under the RICO act as a corrupt and racketeering-influenced organization. Universities these days have the moral character of electronic churches, and as little educational value. They are an embarrassment to civilization.

I know this. I am sitting in my office in Jocotepec, consorting with a bottle of Padre Kino red—channeling the good Padre if you will. It is insight cheap at the price. A few bucks a liter.

To begin with, sending a child to a university is irresponsible. These days it costs something like a quarter of a million dollars, depending on your choice of frauds. The more notorious of these intellectual brothels, as for example Yale, can cost more. This money, left in the stock market for forty hears, or thirty, would yield enough to keep the possessor in comfort, with sufficient left over for his vices. If the market took a downturn, he could settle for just the vices. In the intervening years, he (or, most assuredly, she) could work in a dive shop.

See? By sending our young to college, we are impoverishing them, and ourselves, and sentencing them to a life of slavery in some grim cubicle painted federal-wall green. Personally, I’d rather be chained in a trireme.

Besides, the effect of a university education can be gotten more easily by other means. If it is thought desirable to expose the young to low propaganda, any second-hand bookstore can provide copies of Trotsky, Marcuse, Gloria Steinem, and the Washington Post. These and a supply of Dramamine, in the space of a week, would provide eighty percent of the content of a college education. A beer truck would finish the job. The student would save four years which could more profitably be spent in selling drugs, or in frantic cohabitation or—wild thought—in reading, traveling, and otherwise cultivating himself.

This has been known to happen, though documentation is hard to find.

To the extent that universities actually try to teach anything, which is to say to a very limited extent, they do little more than inhibit intelligent students of inquiring mind. And they are unnecessary: The professor’s role is purely disciplinary: By threats of issuing failing grades, he ensures that the student comes to class and reads certain things. But a student who has to be forced to learn should not be in school in the first place. By making a chore of what would otherwise be a pleasure, the professor instills a lifelong loathing of study.

The truth is that universities positively discourage learning. Think about it. Suppose you wanted to learn Twain. A fruitful approach might be to read Twain. The man wrote to be read, not analyzed tediously and inaccurately by begowned twits. It might help to read a life of Twain. All of this the student could do, happily, even joyously, sitting under a tree of an afternoon. This, I promise, is what Twain had in mind.

But no. The student must go to a class in American Literatue, and be asked by some pompous drone, “Now, what is Twain trying to tell us in paragraph four?” This presumes that Twain knew less well than the professor what he was trying to say, and that he couldn’t say it by himself. Not being much of a writer, the poor man needs the help of a semiliterate drab who couldn’t sell a pancake recipe to Boy’s Life. As bad, the approach suggests that the student is too dim to see the obvious or think for himself. He can’t read a book without a middleman. He probably ends by hating Twain.

When I am dictator, anyone convicted of literary criticism will be drawn and quartered, dragged through the streets as a salutary lesson to the wise, and dropped in the public drains.

Why is the ceiling spinning? Maybe I’m caught in a gravitational anomaly.

The truth is that anyone who wants to learn anything can do it better on his own. If you want to learn to write, for example, lock yourself in a room with copies of Strunk and White, and Fowler, and a supply of Padre Kino, and a loaded shotgun. The books will provide technique, the good Padre the inspiration, and you can use the shotgun on any tenured intrusion who offers advice. They tend to be spindly. A twenty-gauge should be sufficient.

Worse, these alleged academies, these dark nights of the soul encourage moral depravity. This is not just my opinion. It can be shown statistically. Virtually all practitioners of I-banking, advertising, and law began by going to some university. Go to Manhattan and visit any prestigious nest of foul attorneys engaged in circumventing the law. Most will have attended schools in the Ivy League. The better the school, the worse the outcome. Any trace of principle, of contemplative wonder, will have been squeezed out of them as if they were grapes.

Perhaps once universities had something to do with the mind, the arts, with reflection, with grasping or grasping at man’s place in a curious universe. No longer. Now they are a complex scam of interlocking directorates. They employ professors, usually mediocre, to sell diplomas, usually meaningless, needed to get jobs nobody should want, for the benefit of corporations who want the equivalent of docile assembly-line workers.

See, first you learn that you have to finish twelve years of grade school and high school. The point is not to teach you anything; if it were, they would give you a diploma when you passed a comprehensive test, which you might do in the fifth grade. The point is to accustom you to doing things you detest. Then they tell you that you need four more years in college or you won’t be quite human and anyway starve from not getting a job. For those of this downtrodden bunch who are utterly lacking in independence, there is graduate school.

The result is twenty years wasted when you should have been out in the world, having a life worth talking about in bars—riding motorcycles, sacking cities, lolling on Pacific beaches or hiking in the Northwest. You learn that structure trumps performance, that existence is supposed to be dull. It prepares you to spend years on lawsuits over somebody else’s trademarks or simply going buzzbuzzbuzz in a wretched federal office. Only two weeks a year do you get to do what you want to do. This we pay for?

What if you sent your beloved daughter to a university and they sent you back an advertising executive?

I think we’re having an earthquake. When the floor stops heaving, I’m going to send out for more Padre Kino.

Lack of sleep saps men's brain power

Via Futurepundit

http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/brain/mg19125615.000-lack-of-sleep-saps-mens-brain-power.html

Lack of sleep saps men's brain power
22 July 2006
From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.

IF YOU have ever thought you were stupid to sleep with someone, consider this. Sharing your bed could actually make you stupid if you are a man – at least temporarily.

Even without having sex, bed sharing disturbs sleep quality, say Gerhard Kloesch and colleagues from the University of Vienna, Austria. The team recruited eight unmarried, childless couples, and used questionnaires and a wrist activity monitor, an “actigraph”, to assess sleep patterns after 10 nights together and 10 apart.

Men and women fared differently. While men thought they slept better with a partner, and women believed they didn't, actually both sexes had more disturbed sleep, even when they did not have sex. Lack of sleep led to increased stress hormone levels in men, and reduced their ability to perform simple cognitive tests the next day.

However, the women apparently slept more deeply when they did sleep, since they claimed to be more refreshed than their sleep time suggested. Their stress levels and mental scores did not suffer to the same extent.

Kloesch presented his work at a meeting of the Forum of European Neurosciences in Vienna last week.

Sleeping with someone also affected dream recall, with women remembering more after sleeping alone and men recalling best after sex.

A new pope

Via :

A New Pope

Russian underground

Via : Gorgeous photos of underground Russian tunnels.

JG complaint log

* JG said on 07/11 that he would investigate why I'm not getting paged by big brother. Today (07/18/2006), I had to investigate myself. Discovered that my cell phone number was entered incorrectly in the BB configuration scripts.

* JG said that he would update the sysadmin documentation on June 14. As of July 18, two days before he's scheduled to leave for Amsterdam, he had not completed them.

* Not very forthcoming with information. For example, on 07/12/2006, I asked John how he would distribute the new StockPrices file after

“Thanks! How will you distribute the file to the other servers once it's finished building?”

“I have a script I run which does the distribution.”

“What is the script name?”

“distributeOnly.sh”

So rather than telling me the name of the script, he makes me ask for it.

The Amazing Screw on Head

Via : The Amazing Screw on Head

I watched the pilot, and it's good stuff.

http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=2&id=36963

“Amazing Screw-On Head features the voices of Paul Giamatti, David Hyde Pierce and Molly Shannon in a story about a robot secret agent (Giamatti) working for the U.S. government under President Lincoln. After watching the pilot of Amazing Screw-On Head, SCI FI Pulse viewers will be asked to fill out an online survey crafted by the NBC Universal research department. The results of the online survey will help SCI FI executives decide whether or not to green-light the pilot to series. Produced by Kickstart Productions, the pilot was written by Bryan Fuller (Dead Like Me, Wonderfalls). Fuller and Jason Netter serve as executive producers, with Mignola as art director. Chris Prynoski directs.”

Happiness: A User's Manual

http://www.newyorkmetro.com/news/features/17574/index.html

Happiness: A User's Manual
Twenty strategies adapted from the scientific research and applied to New York living.
By Ben Mathis-Lilley
Decide where to go to college by picking two decent schools and flipping a coin.
The relatively unexamined life is worth living. Barry Schwartz’s The Paradox of Choice documents numerous studies in which thinking too hard about multiple choices leads people to preemptively regret the options they’re going to miss out on. This triggers a stress reaction that tends to focus narrowly on random variables—producing unwise decisions, paralysis, and superfluous law degrees. Those who seize the first option that meets their standards (which don’t have to be low, just defined) are happier than those who insist on finding the perfect solution.

Don’t go to law school.
Lawyers are 3.6 times more likely to be depressed than members of other professions, and it’s not just because their jobs are more stressful. For most people, job stress has little effect on happiness unless it is accompanied by a lack of control (lawyers, of course, have clients to listen to) or involves taking something away from somebody else (a common feature of the legal system).

Fire your therapist if he so much as mentions your childhood.
Contra Freud and pro common sense, much of Authentic Happiness author Martin Seligman’s research suggests that rehashing events that enraged you long ago tends to produce depression rather than sweet closure and relief.

If someone tells you he’s still pining for his ex, ask the ex out.
Stumbling on Happiness author Dan Gilbert is currently conducting a study designed to show that the best way to predict how much you’ll enjoy a blind date is to ask the last person to go out with your date how much fun he had.

If you can’t decide what TV to buy, walk across the hall and ask your neighbor if he likes his.
In multiple studies, subjects felt they’d be better able to predict their reaction to an experience by imagining it, rather than hearing somebody else’s testimony. Even regarding such seemingly straightforward activities as deciding whether to eat pretzels or potato chips, they were wrong. Turns out, people are happier following advice.

Send the kids off to day care, summer camp, and boarding school.
On a day-to-day basis, caring for children creates roughly the same level of satisfaction as washing the dishes. In fact, surveys of parents invariably find a clear dip in happiness after the Blessed Miracle of Childbirth, which continues unabated for twenty years—bottoming out during adolescence—and only returns to pre-birth levels when the child finally leaves home.

But make sure they’re busy once they get there.
Seligman cites research indicating that children who develop hobbies and interests besides loitering and watching TV are much more likely to be satisfied later in life.

If you go on a shopping spree, throw away the receipts.
In one study cited by both Schwartz and Gilbert, photography students were allowed to keep only one picture taken during their course. Some students were later allowed to swap their choice for a different photo, yet those who couldn’t change were much happier. How did they deal with inflexibility? By rationalizing how much they enjoyed their new decoration.

If you’re on the fence about whether to sell your stock, sell it.
Most people predict that they’d be more unhappy if they sold a stock that went through the roof than if they kept one that tanked. They’re wrong—aggressive actions that go awry are mentally catalogued as valuable learning experiences.

Take the local, and don’t wait for the express.
Inaction, on the other hand, gnaws away at the mind relentlessly, like so many rats chewing on an empty Mountain Dew bottle someone dropped onto the tracks as you idly waited for the 4. You should have just jumped on the 6.

Give up the great American novel, and start temping.
Some poor countries (China, Brazil) are happier than others, but few nations are mired in spiritually fulfilling poverty. Money, when used to feel secure about your ability to shelter and feed yourself, can, in fact, buy happiness.

But don’t work overtime . . .
The marginal life-enhancing value of each extra dollar quickly levels off, however; hence the existence of James Bond villains and studies showing that lottery winners and Forbes 100 members are no more likely to be satisfied than anyone else.

. . . As long as you’re content socializing within your tax bracket.
Nevertheless, being aware of how much less money one has acquired than one’s peers is quantifiably frustrating.

Join a church, a yoga studio, an Alcoholics Anonymous group, or an underground fight club.
People who have more friends and belong to community-building groups are happier. To paraphrase the Norm MacDonald–era “Weekend Update,” perhaps that’s the kind of finding that could have been published in the scientific journal Duh, but there it is.

Order from the same takeout menu every time.
Researchers found that subjects asked to choose their meals weeks in advance mistakenly predicted that variety would make them happier, while those who simply decided what to eat on the spot were completely satisfied with the same thing each week. (Although eating macaroni and cheese endlessly, like repeating any pleasant experience over and over, reduces its appeal—so switch it up with cheeseburgers.)

Take advantage of your exercise machine’s “cooldown period.”
One study found that men who underwent short, uniformly unpleasant colonoscopies found them more repulsive than men who had long procedures with a brief respite near the end. Adding a slightly less grueling epilogue to a grueling but valuable experience—like a workout—makes you more willing to repeat it in the future, even if it means an increase in the overall gruel endured.

Patronize King Cole’s and other establishments that employ a “mixologist”; avoid any bar named after an Irish person.
Spending your alcohol allowance on a few finely crafted cocktails is probably better than guzzling giant troughs of beer, since the ability to limit one’s indulgence is one of the baseline characteristics of happy people. Researchers aren’t sure whether moderation is chicken or egg, but they do know that teetotaling doesn’t confer any particular advantage.

Ask the next person you meet on Match.com to marry you.
Studies show that married people are happier than unmarried people. Too much choice, whether over tonight’s dinner or your partner for the next 50 years, can create paralysis and anxiety. If you make a mistake, you have the capacity to rationalize the worst decisions. And if all of that doesn’t work, well, we’re able to find happiness in even the most hopeless situations.

Splurge on a restaurant after the Yankees playoff game.
College kids surveyed in the weeks before emotionally high-stakes athletic competitions tended to dramatically overestimate how happy they’d be after wins because they forgot victories don’t eliminate sources of irritation. Similarly, they overestimated how upset they’d be after their team lost because they failed to remember that they could be comforted by other sources of pleasure.

Don’t watch the Knicks.
Not related to any recent scientific findings. Just sound advice.

domain_name_ideas

craschworks
existencelabs
blueworks
crisscrosscrasch
zerasch
zechris
techhun
technohun
liferover
nomader
roamerlife
agelessdog
godpack
godfoot
godleg
stoutfoot
hardyfish
survivaldude
survivalguy
survivallab
godslab
idlelab
idlemob
idlework
craku
godcrak
craklord
battlenest
hedoniq
epicureanlabs
hedonicsmith
ubersmith
ubersmith
roadrasch
raschworks
raschfactory
brainrasch
uberasch
raschsquad
rasch-o-rama
uberwatch
gimpking
hicklord
hickgod
rubelord
rubegod
technohick
technohick
technorube
technofire
raschconclusions
hipsmith
knowndevil
christofoolery
goofhound

Russian practical joke

Russian practical joke

Via BoingBoing