Lasting marriage worth over $100 K/year?

From the Economics and The Pursuit of Happiness conference held at Nuffield College, Oxford:

Wellbeing over Time in Britain and The US
D.G. Blanchflower and Andrew Oswald

The standard of lviing in the industrialized nations has been steadily increasing over the last few decades. Yet some observers wonder whether we are really getting any happier. This paper addresses that question by examining well-being data on 100,000 randomly sampled Americans and Britons from the early 1970s to the late 1990s. Reported levels of happiness have declined over the period in the United States. Life satisfaction has been approximately flat through time in Great Britains. Counter to the general U.S. trend, the happiness of blacks in that nation has risen since the early 1970s. The black-white happiness differential has diminished. The happiness of American men has grown. Despite legislation aimed to reduce gender discrimination, the well-being of women has fallen noticeably.

Well-being equations have a stable structure: the British equations look almost identical to the U.S. ones. Money does buy happiness. The paper also calculates the dollar values of life events like unemployment and divorce. They are large. A lasting marriage, for example, is calculated to be worth $100,000 a year.

I haven't read the full paper yet, but how can marriage be worth over $100 K/year? Roughly half the individuals in the U.S. make less than a third that amount.

Robert Nozick interview at Laissez Faire Books.

Via Robert Hettinga via Edward Feser of the Hayek-L mailing list:

I thought Hayek-L members mind find of interest a recent interview with Robert Nozick (at the Laissez Faire Books website) concerning his
forthcoming book _Invariance_. Among other things, it touches on the relevance of evolutionary theory to ethics, a new criticism developed by Nozick of Popper's views on induction, and some remarks on Ayn Rand and on Nozick's early days as a libertarian philosopher at Harvard. Nozick also says that his alleged apostasy from libertarianism has been “greatly exaggerated,” and that the new book's chapter on ethics indicates the extent (apparently still considerable) to which he still falls within the libertarian camp.

The interview can be found at:

http://www.laissezfairebooks.com/index.cfm?eid=358

Wacky patents

Appendix A of N. Stephan Kinsella's excellent paper, Against Intellectual Property contains a list of, uh, unusal patents:

Christmas Tree Stand Watering System, U.S. Pat. No. 4,993,176,
Feb. 19, 1991 (Christmas tree watering stand shaped like Santa Claus);

Initiation Apparatus, U.S. Pat. No. 819,814, May 8, 1906 ( harmless
way of initiating a candidate into a fraternity by shocking him with
electrodes);

Method of Exercising a Cat, U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,036, Aug. 22, 1995
(shining a laser light onto the floor to fascinate a cat and cause it
to chase the light);

Pat on the Back Apparatus, U.S. Pat. No. 4,608,967, Sep. 2, 1986
(apparatus with simulated human hand to pat the user on the back);

Hyper-Light-Speed Antenna, U.S. Pat. No. 6,025,810, Feb. 15, 2000
(poking hole in another dimension to transmit RF waves at
faster-than-light speed, incidentally accelerating plant growth);

Force-Sensitive, Sound-Playing Condom, U.S. Pat. No. 5,163,447,
Nov. 17, 1992 (self-explanatory; for example, it could play Dixie );

Method and System for Placing a Purchase Order via a Communications
Network, U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,411, Sep. 28, 1999 (Amazon.com s
one-click method for purchasing an item on the world wide web by
single mouse-click);

Financial Certificates, System and Process, U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,063,
Jan. 25, 2000 (inflation-indexed gift certificate or mutual fund
share);

Method and System for Measuring Leadership Effective-ness,
U.S. Pat. No. 6,007,340, Dec. 28, 1999 (assigned to Electronic Data
Systems Corporation);

Sanitary Appliance for Birds, U.S. Pat. No. 2,882,858, April 21, 1959
(bird diaper); w Religious Soap, U.S. Pat. No. 3,936,384, Feb. 3,
1976 (bar of soap with religious design on one side and prayer on the
other)

Method of Preserving the Dead, U.S. Pat. No. 748,284, Dec. 29, 1903 (preserving dead person s head in block of glass)

Human heads embedded in glass make great gifts, suitable for birthdays, anniversaries, and bar mitzvahs….

Well, I want one….

Starting my own religion…

Been playing with the idea of starting my own religion.

Perhaps I'm too pessimistic, but it seems that the philosophical systems I endorse–libertarianism, transhumanism–don't seem to have much of a proselytizing meme built into them.

I attended Extro 3 (1997) and Extro 5 (2001). Despite the four year difference, attendance at both meetings seemed about the same — roughly 150 people. Libertarian vote totals also seem to have remained constant, if not fallen.

As a result, religious fundamentalists and luddites shape public policy–witness the bans on cloning, stem cell research. Anti-science, anti-reason forces seem to be much more vital as organizations.

For example, according to sociologist Rodney Stark,

“…Christianity grew at a rate of 40 percent
per decade during the first several centuries after the death of Christ.
Interestingly, he notes this estimate is close to the Mormon growth rate of 43 percent per decade during the 20th century…”

If growth rates continue, the Mormon church will have more than 270 million members by 2080, making it the largest christian religion after Roman Catholicism. (Though the Jehovah's Witnesses are catching up fast….)

What can we learn from sects like Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses?

This paper by Stark and Laurence R. L. Iannacone has some answers:

Journal of Contemporary Religion,
Vol. 12, No. 2, 1997 133
Why the Jehovah s Witnesses Grow so Rapidly: A
Theoretical Application
RODNEY STARK & LAURENCE R. IANNACCONE

LinuxJournal client troubles

Spent too much time this morning trying to get the LinuxJournal client working on my Linux machine. It kept bombing out during the ./configure, complaining that I had not installed GTK+ properly…but as I could tell, I had installed GTK and glib correctly. Hmmmm.

Sleep Deprivation

amanda42 posted an interesting commentary on productivity and value creation. Her post included snippet from her inspiring schedule. It reminded me of some research regarding the effects of sleep deprivation:

From Dement's The Promise of Sleep:

“In his latest research, University of Pennsylvania fatigue expert David Dinges restricted the sleep of volunteers over a two-week period. David concluded that when people sleep only four hours a night for two weeks, their performance scores are the same as those of people who were kept up for three straight days and nights.

Dave found that within his test group, individual sensivity to sleep load initially varied widely, much the way people's susceptibility to alcohol does. But at the end of the two-week period, everyone was seriously imparied by long-term sleep debt.

Dave and the other researchers have demonstrated that chronic sleep loss degrades nearly every aspect of human performance: vigilance (ability to receive information, alertness (ability to act on information), and attention span. In simple terms, a large sleep debt “makes you stupid.” People take longer to react to challenging situations, and their reactions are more variable and less effective than when they are well rested….

….The comparison between sleep deprivation and alcohol intoxication is striking in this regard. Researchers in Australia have found that there is a more than just a surface similarity between the two. The Australian investigators split 40 volunteers into two groups. One group was kept awake for 28 hours, from 8:00 A.M. until 2:00 P.M. the next day. The other group was given 10 to 15 grams of alcohol every 30 minutes starting at 8:00 A.M., until each volunteer's blood alcohol level reached 0.1 percent, which is more than legally drunk in most locales. During these periods, both groups were given hand-eye coordination tests. The Australian researchers found that after 17 hours awake (at 1:00 A.M, when biological alerting is declining), the sleep-deprived group had the same test scores as drinking volunteers who had blood-alcohol levels of 0.05 percent. After 24 hours awake, the sleep-deprived group had the same coordination deficits as those with the maximum blood-alcohol level, 0.1 percent….” (pg. 231-232)